WCAG and Government Web Standards in Canada
20 September 2017
What is web accessibility standards?
Web Standards have been around pretty much since the Internet started. I don’t have in mind any aspect of the World Wide Web that hasn’t been standardized so far. Despite this fact, the compliance of many standards were loosely followed for years until recently, let’s say the last 5 years perhaps. The more the population becomes increasingly Web savvy, the more awareness there is. Nowadays, the trendiest aspect of Web Standards is probably Accessibility Standards.The web accessibility standards are a list of suggestions that became an ISO standard (around 2012). It makes content accessible to a wider range of people with disabilities, including blindness and low vision, deafness and hearing loss, learning disabilities, cognitive limitations, limited movement, speech disabilities, photosensitivity and combinations of these.
(Source) Currently WCAG 2.0 has 3 levels of compliance: A, AA, and AAA. In short, the higher they get the more demanding it becomes. If for example we take a Guideline 1.4 that conveys that content must be distinguishable, then the 3 levels of that rule will imply the following improvements:- Level A: Colour is not used as the only visual means of indicating actions, prompting responses or distinguishing visual elements.
- Level AA: Text and images of text must have a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1.
- Level AAA: Text and images of text must have a contrast ratio of at least 7:1.
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
Given that the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat provides advice and makes recommendations to the Treasury Board committee of ministers on how the government spends money on programs and services, how it regulates and how it is managed. In this character, it provides access to all Treasury Board-approved policies and related instruments for organizations across the Government of Canada. So, this government agency oversees regulating the Web Accessibility Guidelines of the Canadian Government (see specific links in the table at the end). Now, based on the resources found at the writing of this article, the Government of Canada largely exceeds the provinces’ efforts. Not only does it follow numerous standards but they also have an out-of-the-box ready to use framework that comply with such accessibility standards. But how did they get to his point? Well, unfortunately our government got into the WCAG wagon long ago through a lawsuit: Jodhan vs. Attorney General of Canada. So, in order to avoid disability discrimination lawsuits, they got into developing their own open source framework for the Federal Government use (and for everybody else, of course, being an open source project). The outcome of that effort is the Web Experience Toolkit (WET), a quite impressive framework based on Bootstrap with variants for Drupal, WordPress and more. Most, if not all, federal government websites comply with WCAG 2.0 AA thanks to the WET framework.PROVINCES AND TERRITORIES
Most of the Canadian provinces websites comply with WCAG 2.0 AA or are in the progress of doing so. This province compliance (or non-compliance) refers only to the province government’s website and not to its cities and municipalities, which in most cases do not comply to the aforementioned level. For example, the Quebec Province even has its own Web standard name (based on WCAG at different levels). British Columbia, not only follows WCAG, but also has its own Content Management System although for instance Vancouver doesn’t follow it. It only states that “The site is designed with consideration for people unable to use a mouse” or that “to assist our visitors who are visually impaired or blind, our website is compatible with a screen-reading software”. Ontario has its own policy for overall accessibility policy named Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA) with Toronto, Ottawa, Kingston following, and loosely followed by smaller municipalities at least on web-related matters. For a more detailed outlook on all provinces let’s present this information on a table, although please be advised that the table below reflects findings to the end of December 2016, so as time passes links could reflect updates.
Defined (by Dec. 2016)Federal Government Conforms to WCAG 2.0 AA |
In Progress (by Dec. 2016)Manitoba No statement of WCAG conformity |
Unknown (by Dec. 2016)New Brunswick No accessibility page found |
| Alberta Conforms to WCAG 2.0 AA | Prince Edward Island Conforms to WCAG without specifying level (Oct 2016) | Yukon No accessibility page found |
| British Columbia Conforms to WCAG 2.0 AA | Saskatchewan No statement of WCAG conformity | Nunavut No accessibility page found |
| Ontario Conforms to WCAG 2.0 AA | Northwest Territories No statement of WCAG conformity | |
Quebec
|
Nova Scotia Conforms to WCAG without specifying level (Oct 2016) | |
| Newfoundland and Labrador Conforms to WCAG 2.0 AA |
See our other BLOGS
Stay informed: Explore our accessible and informative content on various technology topics.



